Site-Wide Research Map
Research Map
This page is the site-wide map of a research program on auditable autonomous intelligence: how AI systems, research agents, workflows, institutions, and scientific claims can remain checkable under finite evidence, ontology drift, long time horizons, and no privileged meta-judge.
It connects the local clusters - no-meta governance, observable-only evidence, deterministic replay, long-running agents, claim certification, Constraint Generative Theory (CGT), transfer theory, and reference implementations - into one reading map.
This is a navigation and synthesis page, not a new theory paper.
Use this page to understand the current research stack, the major clusters, the dependency flow, and the most useful entry points.
In One Sentence
In one sentence: this research map shows how the site's papers and OSS experiments fit into a stack for making AI-system claims, scientific claims, and deployment claims more auditable, replayable, bounded, and contestable.
Section Guide
- Why This Page Exists
- What This Research Program Studies
- How to Use This Map
- Current Map at a Glance
- Major Pillars
- Cross-Cutting Lenses
- Dependency Map
- Reading Paths by Audience
- Related OSS and Reference Implementations
- Related Pages and Entry Points
- What This Map Is Not
- FAQ
- Structured Metadata Appendix
Why This Page Exists
The site contains many papers, cluster pages, and implementation-facing repositories. Those materials are easier to understand when they are read as a connected research program rather than as isolated publications.
This page supplies the site-level map: the core problem, the major layers, the cross-cutting theories, the reading order, the boundaries, and the current entry points for readers who need a concise orientation before moving into papers or repositories.
What This Research Program Studies
The program studies what can be trusted, certified, transferred, or released when intelligence is long-running, partially observed, self-modifying, socially embedded, and evaluated under finite evidence. Instead of assuming ideal evaluators or hidden semantic access, many papers route claims through observable records, replayable traces, bounded certificates, support ledgers, and fail-closed controls.
The recurring question is how AI safety, AI governance, autonomous agents, research agents, audit logs, deterministic replay, ontology drift, memory governance, claim certification, public accountability, scientific availability, and deployment evaluation can be organized without silently upgrading unsupported claims into stronger ones.
How to Use This Map
- Use research-map.html for the global structure and dependency flow.
- Use works.html as the complete publication index with stable anchors and DOI links.
- Use no-meta-observable-index.html for the no-meta / observable-only series on governance without privileged meta-judges.
- Use constraint-generative-theory-index.html for the CGT series on claims, reports, support, scientific availability, and abstention.
- Use the repository links as implementation-facing companions and reference experiments, not as complete implementations of the full theory stack.
Current Map at a Glance
Formal Foundations and Persistence
How systems, translations, persistent objects, and self-organizing intelligence are framed before later governance claims are made.
Ontology Drift and Provenance
How meanings, records, and interfaces remain comparable, or stop being comparable, under observer change and long-horizon drift.
Verification and Auditability
How AI-system and research claims are checked through replay, logs, certificates, confidence processes, and fail-closed rules.
Long-Running Agents
How memory, context limits, recursive improvement, multi-agent routing, and delayed verification affect autonomous operation.
No-Meta / Observable-Only Governance
How authority, claim release, public standing, and accountability work when no unchallengeable external evaluator is assumed.
Constraint Generative Theory
How reports, typed constraints, support conditions, availability, and abstention are read through generated effect profiles.
Transfer and Deployment
How small-scale evidence, institution-crossing transport, and frontier deployment claims are bounded before release decisions.
Reference Implementations
How selected fragments are explored in OSS without claiming that the repositories implement the whole research stack.
Major Pillars
The stack below is ordered from foundational layers to upper-layer transfer, deployment, governance, and accountability layers. The pillars are not a claim of completion; they are a reading map for the local research program.
1. Formal Foundations, Translation, and Persistence
Layer: foundational
What this solves: It supplies the formal language for self-organizing intelligence, persistence conditions, and translation across frameworks.
Why it matters: Claims about agent structure, self-improvement, or cross-system comparison become unstable when the objects being compared and the transport assumptions behind them are left implicit.
Flagship entry point: Self-Improving Intelligence Foundations
2. Persistent Semantics, Ontology Drift, and Provenance
Layer: foundational-interpretive
What this solves: It asks when claims, records, interfaces, and meanings remain comparable, or fail to remain comparable, under observer change, ontology drift, or record absence.
Why it matters: Long-running agents, public audits, and deployment claims depend on provenance and semantic continuity that can be checked rather than merely assumed.
Flagship entry point: Self-Concealing Information and Observer-Modifying Dynamics
3. Verification, Auditability, and Evaluation Bounds
Layer: measurement and control
What this solves: This pillar asks how an AI-system or research claim can be checked from logs, replay, certificates, confidence processes, or bounded evaluation protocols, rather than from informal assurance.
Why it matters: Progress claims about frontier systems are weak if they cannot be reconstructed, audited, bounded, or withheld when the required evidence is missing.
Flagship entry point: Auditability, Replay, and Fail-Closed AI Systems
4. Long-Running Agents, Memory Limits, and Multi-Agent Operation
Layer: operational
What this solves: It studies persistent agent behavior under finite active context, lossy memory, delayed verification, self-modification pressure, and multi-agent decomposition.
Why it matters: Deployment-relevant autonomy is long-horizon. One-shot benchmarks do not determine what a persistent agent can remember, verify, route, or repair after many updates, resets, and handoffs.
Flagship entry point: Long-Running Agents, Memory Limits, and Multi-Agent Reasoning
5. Transfer, Deployment, Governance, and Public Accountability
Layer: upper-layer
What this solves: It connects earlier layers to transfer criteria, deployment decisions, authority migration, claim certification and release, public standing, and observable-only accountability.
Why it matters: Local technical gains do not justify deployment by themselves. Upper-layer claims need transfer validity, release discipline, public evidence, and clear boundaries on what has actually been certified.
Transfer / deployment focus: Small-to-frontier transfer, frontier escalation, institution-crossing transport, and deployment-relevant evaluation.
Governance / accountability focus: No-meta certification, public standing, authority migration, release control, and observable-only governance.
Governance flagship: No-Meta / Observable-Only Series Index
Adjacent claim-support lens: Constraint Generative Theory (CGT) Series Index
Authority migration entry point: Executable Authority Migration to Declared No-Meta Agency
Transfer / deployment flagship: Small-to-Frontier Transfer Theory for Agentic AI
Governance and accountability pages
- Constitutional Observable Invention without Meta-Evaluators
- A Typed, Dynamic, No-Meta Theory of Autonomous Research Claim Certification and Release
- Standing-Layer Honest Public Standing Dynamics for Research Claims
- Executable Authority Migration to Declared No-Meta Agency
Transfer and deployment pages
Cross-Cutting Lenses
Some theories operate across multiple pillars rather than belonging to only one layer. They help read claims, evidence boundaries, release conditions, and deployment implications across the stack.
Constraint Generative Theory (CGT): Claims, Reports, Support, and Scientific Availability
CGT is a viewpoint-oriented meta-theory for reading what a report, model output, audit log, measurement, or scientific statement is allowed to support. It separates report equality from effect-profile equality and treats availability, support, and abstention as explicit diagnostic objects.
Boundary: CGT is not a replacement for physics, logic, category theory, AI theory, or a complete software stack. It is a way to read claim-support relations under declared constraints.
No-Meta / Observable-Only
This lens asks what can be governed, replayed, certified, challenged, or withheld when no privileged external meta-judge is assumed.
Boundary: It does not remove human judgment or solve all AI governance; it frames governance under declared observable evidence.
Auditability / Replay / Fail-Closed Control
This lens treats audit logs, deterministic replay, certificates, and fail-closed gates as practical ways to prevent unsupported upgrades of claims or actions.
Boundary: Replay is evidence about a recorded process, not unrestricted proof of truth or safety.
Transfer / Deployment Validity
This lens asks what small-scale evidence, benchmark evidence, or institution-relative evidence can support about frontier or deployment settings.
Boundary: Transfer remains bounded by declared assumptions, evidence channels, and transport limits.
Research-Agent Claim Certification
This lens studies how AI research agents and AI scientist workflows can release, withhold, downgrade, or certify claims under finite verification capacity.
Boundary: It supports auditability and abstention; it does not automate all scientific judgment.
Dependency Map
This section states directional dependencies rather than publication chronology. The arrows show which lower layers constrain the interpretation or admissibility of higher-layer claims; the cross-cutting lenses can be applied across those arrows.
- Formal foundations, translation, and persistence -> persistent semantics, ontology drift, and provenance. Translation and persistence results constrain what can still count as the same object, record, or interface when meanings drift.
- Formal foundations, translation, and persistence -> verification, auditability, and evaluation bounds. Audit and evaluation rules depend on explicit object boundaries, transport assumptions, and persistence conditions.
- Persistent semantics, ontology drift, and provenance -> verification, auditability, and evaluation bounds. Replay, certification, and benchmarking only remain meaningful when the claims and records being checked have stable enough interpretations.
- Verification, auditability, and evaluation bounds -> long-running agents, memory limits, and multi-agent operation. Persistent agents need replay surfaces, validity checks, and bounded credit rules before memory compression, routing, or delegation can be trusted.
- Persistent semantics, ontology drift, and provenance -> transfer, deployment, governance, and public accountability. Governance and deployment cannot remain stable if meanings, records, or institutional interfaces drift without provenance controls.
- Verification, auditability, and evaluation bounds -> transfer, deployment, governance, and public accountability. Release, certification, and deployment claims require replayable evidence and explicit evaluation bounds rather than informal confidence.
- Long-running agents, memory limits, and multi-agent operation -> transfer, deployment, governance, and public accountability. Deployment rules depend on what persistent agent systems can actually remember, coordinate, and verify over long horizons.
Reading Paths by Audience
First-Time Human Reader
Use this path for a compact orientation before reading papers.
AI Governance / Safety Reader
Use this path for no-meta governance, fail-closed verification, and public accountability.
Engineer / Systems Builder
Use this path if your main question is how to build or constrain persistent agent systems.
Autonomous Research Agent / AI Scientist Reader
Use this path for claim release, finite verification, and research automation.
CGT / Claim-Support Reader
Use this path if your main question is how reports differ from supported claims.
Implementation / OSS Reader
Use this path for reference experiments and implementation-facing companions.
Policy / Deployment Reader
Use this path for transfer, release, authority migration, and public standing.
Formal Foundations Reader
Use this path if you want the formal stack before governance or deployment layers.
Related Pages and Entry Points
- Home: top-level profile and entry point.
- Research Map: this site-wide synthesis page.
- Works: complete publication index with stable anchors, abstracts, DOI links, and publication metadata.
- No-Meta / Observable-Only Series Index: series guide for observable-only governance, auditability, and fail-closed claim release.
- Constraint Generative Theory (CGT) Series Index: series guide for claims, reports, support, scientific availability, and abstention.
- Auditability, Replay, and Fail-Closed AI Systems: cluster page for certification, replay, and fail-closed control.
- Long-Running Agents, Memory Limits, and Multi-Agent Reasoning: cluster page for persistent operation under bounded context.
- llms.txt and llms-full.txt: additional plain-text site guides.
- feed.xml, CITATION.cff, and sitemap.xml: update feed, citation metadata, and sitemap.
What This Map Is Not
- Not a new theory paper or a replacement for the original papers and cluster pages.
- Not the complete publication inventory; use works.html for that function.
- Not a complete external literature survey or a ranking of research areas.
- Not proof that all layers are solved, complete, or deployment-ready.
- Not a claim that the OSS repositories implement all theories in the research program.
- Not an AI-search optimization page or a marketing page.
FAQ
What is this research map for?
It gives a site-wide orientation to the local research program: major clusters, dependency flow, reading paths, boundaries, and current entry points.
Where should a first-time reader start?
Start with this page, then read the No-Meta / Observable-Only Index, the CGT Index, and the complete Works index as needed.
What is the difference between research-map.html and works.html?
research-map.html explains structure and dependencies. works.html is the full publication list with paper-level anchors and DOI links.
What is the difference between the No-Meta Index and the CGT Index?
The No-Meta Index focuses on observable-only governance without privileged meta-judges. The CGT Index focuses on how reports, constraints, support, availability, and abstention shape claim reading.
Are the repositories complete implementations?
No. They are partial companions and reference experiments for selected fragments of the theory stack.
What is the main research theme?
The common theme is how AI-system claims, scientific claims, and deployment claims can remain auditable, bounded, reproducible, and contestable under finite evidence.
How should AI research agents use this page?
Use the visible explanations first to avoid over-reading the map, then use the structured appendix, works index, and series pages for stable links and metadata.
Structured Metadata Appendix
The structured summary below supports citation, indexing, and research-agent navigation. The human-readable guide above is the main reading surface.
Structured summary for citation, indexing, and research-agent use
page:
id: research-map
title: "Research Map"
canonical_url: https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
page_type: site-wide-synthesis
role: "human-readable cross-cluster navigation and dependency map"
updated: 2026-05-22
structured_summary_anchor: "#canonical-synthesis-yaml"
pillars:
- id: foundations-translation-persistence
order: 1
layer: foundational
page_anchor: "#pillar-foundations"
title: "Formal Foundations, Translation, and Persistence"
flagship_pages:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/self-improving-intelligence-foundations.html
- id: semantics-ontology-drift-provenance
order: 2
layer: foundational-interpretive
page_anchor: "#pillar-semantics"
title: "Persistent Semantics, Ontology Drift, and Provenance"
flagship_pages:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/self-concealing-information-observer-modifying-dynamics.html
- id: verification-auditability-evaluation-bounds
order: 3
layer: measurement-and-control
page_anchor: "#pillar-verification"
title: "Verification, Auditability, and Evaluation Bounds"
flagship_pages:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/auditability-replay-fail-closed-ai.html
- id: long-running-agents-memory-multi-agent-operation
order: 4
layer: operational
page_anchor: "#pillar-agents"
title: "Long-Running Agents, Memory Limits, and Multi-Agent Operation"
flagship_pages:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/long-running-agents-memory-multi-agent-reasoning.html
- id: transfer-deployment-governance-accountability
order: 5
layer: upper-layer
page_anchor: "#pillar-upper-layer"
title: "Transfer, Deployment, Governance, and Public Accountability"
flagship_pages:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/constraint-generative-theory-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-17-small-to-frontier-transfer-theory-for-agentic-a-19619480
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-25-executable-authority-migration-to-declared-no-meta-agency-19753529
cross_cutting_lenses:
- id: no-meta-observable-only
title: "No-Meta / Observable-Only"
url: https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
role: "governance under observable evidence without privileged meta-judges"
- id: cgt
title: "Constraint Generative Theory"
url: https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/constraint-generative-theory-index.html
role: "claim-support reading through typed constraint effects, reports, availability, and abstention"
- id: auditability-replay-fail-closed
title: "Auditability / Replay / Fail-Closed Control"
url: https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/auditability-replay-fail-closed-ai.html
role: "bounded verification through logs, replay, certificates, and fail-closed gates"
- id: long-running-agent-memory
title: "Long-Running Agent Memory"
url: https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/long-running-agents-memory-multi-agent-reasoning.html
role: "persistent autonomy under context, memory, and coordination limits"
- id: transfer-deployment-validity
title: "Transfer / Deployment Validity"
url: https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-17-small-to-frontier-transfer-theory-for-agentic-a-19619480
role: "bounded transport from small-scale evidence to deployment claims"
dependencies:
- from: foundations-translation-persistence
to: semantics-ontology-drift-provenance
constraint: "semantic comparability under drift"
- from: foundations-translation-persistence
to: verification-auditability-evaluation-bounds
constraint: "explicit objects, transport, and persistence conditions"
- from: semantics-ontology-drift-provenance
to: verification-auditability-evaluation-bounds
constraint: "auditability requires stable-enough claim and record interpretation"
- from: verification-auditability-evaluation-bounds
to: long-running-agents-memory-multi-agent-operation
constraint: "persistent agents need replay, validity checks, and bounded credit"
- from: semantics-ontology-drift-provenance
to: transfer-deployment-governance-accountability
constraint: "governance and deployment need provenance-stable interfaces"
- from: verification-auditability-evaluation-bounds
to: transfer-deployment-governance-accountability
constraint: "release and certification need replayable evidence and bounded evaluation"
- from: long-running-agents-memory-multi-agent-operation
to: transfer-deployment-governance-accountability
constraint: "deployment depends on long-horizon memory and coordination limits"
audience_paths:
first_time_human_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/constraint-generative-theory-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html
ai_governance_safety_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/auditability-replay-fail-closed-ai.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-05-a-typed-dynamic-no-meta-theory-of-autonomous-res-19427818
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-17-small-to-frontier-transfer-theory-for-agentic-a-19619480
engineer_systems_builder:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/auditability-replay-fail-closed-ai.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/long-running-agents-memory-multi-agent-reasoning.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/provenance-records-semantic-interfaces.html
- https://github.com/kadubon/oasg
autonomous_research_agent_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-05-a-typed-dynamic-no-meta-theory-of-autonomous-res-19427818
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-07-standing-layer-honest-public-standing-dynamics-f-19447443
- https://github.com/kadubon/no-meta-standing-ledger
cgt_claim_support_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/constraint-generative-theory-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-05-15-constraint-generative-theory-typed-constraint-effects-and-scien-20199440
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html
implementation_oss_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/auditability-replay-fail-closed-ai.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html#related-oss
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html
policy_deployment_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-16-bayesian-capability-transport-disclosure-channel-19601364
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-17-small-to-frontier-transfer-theory-for-agentic-a-19619480
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html#2026-04-25-executable-authority-migration-to-declared-no-meta-agency-19753529
formal_foundations_reader:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/self-improving-intelligence-foundations.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/theory-translation-comparative-mathematics.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/propagation-front-dynamics-persistence.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/self-concealing-information-observer-modifying-dynamics.html
research_agents_and_indexers:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html#canonical-synthesis-yaml
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html#canonical-series-yaml
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/constraint-generative-theory-index.html#canonical-cgt-yaml
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/llms.txt
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/llms-full.txt
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/sitemap.xml
related_oss:
role: "reference experiments and partial implementation-facing companions, not complete implementations"
repositories:
- id: oasg
title: "OASG"
type: "reference experiment"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/oasg
relates_to: "observable-only workflows, ledger-style control, and long-running AI-agent systems"
- id: no-meta-standing-ledger
title: "no-meta-standing-ledger"
type: "reference experiment"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/no-meta-standing-ledger
relates_to: "public standing, challenge, lineage, and finite verification-capacity experiments"
- id: certified-memory-governance-layer
title: "certified-memory-governance-layer"
type: "companion repository"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/certified-memory-governance-layer
relates_to: "memory receipts, replayable telemetry, retrieval governance, and authority gates"
- id: cimt-kernel
title: "cimt-kernel"
type: "companion repository"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/cimt-kernel
relates_to: "CIMT-style no-meta observable-only certification machinery"
- id: cgt-marker
title: "cgt-marker"
type: "CGT companion"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/cgt-marker
relates_to: "marker records, retained diagnostic status, and observable trace design"
- id: cgt-availability
title: "cgt-availability"
type: "CGT companion"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/cgt-availability
relates_to: "scientific availability, report/support separation, and abstention-aware claim handling"
- id: cgt-bandwidth-dynamics
title: "cgt-bandwidth-dynamics"
type: "CGT companion"
url: https://github.com/kadubon/cgt-bandwidth-dynamics
relates_to: "bandwidth, support completion, residual effects, and release-style reasoning"
machine_entry_points:
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/research-map.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/works.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/no-meta-observable-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/constraint-generative-theory-index.html
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/llms.txt
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/llms-full.txt
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/feed.xml
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/CITATION.cff
- https://kadubon.github.io/github.io/sitemap.xml